Skip to content

quic: is stream priority compatible to w3c webtransport sendgroups ? #63654

@martenrichter

Description

@martenrichter

Currently, when calling createBidirectionalStream you can specify a priority (same also for unidirectional stream):

priority {string} The priority level of the stream. One of 'high', 'default', or 'low'. Default: 'default'.

The W3C specification for webtransport defines a sendGroup mechanism; see https://www.w3.org/TR/webtransport/#sendGroup.

For me, this is not the most important mechanism (but I can not tell for others), but I just wanted to bring it to your attention (@jasnell) and ask if it is worth thinking about an implementation that aligns with this spec, as the workgroup has put much thought into it.

Currently, I think it is a very different approach.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions